Legally, these Foreign University campuses in India don’t need to implement reservations, leading to the creation of a parallel higher education system in India that is distinct from the Indian model of social inclusion.
The entry of Foreign Universities into India is a multifaceted phenomenon, driven by shifts in the global education landscape and by the ambitions of India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The arrival of foreign universities in India is the combined outcome of capitalizing on the country’s young demographic dividend, reducing revenue risk, and leveraging supportive government policies. It is also a strategy to capture a vast new market. This move creates a “win-win situation” for both the foreign universities and India.
Foreign universities are grappling with financial and demographic challenges in their home countries, prompting them to turn towards large markets like India for revenue diversification.
Universities in several Western countries, particularly the UK and Europe, are becoming increasingly dependent on international students. In the UK, local students’ fees have been stagnant at around £9,250 since 2017, while inflation has risen. This has led to deficits in teaching and research, forcing universities to rely heavily on higher fees from international students to sustain operations.
In recent times, a drop in international student applications due to UK visa restrictions and stricter regulations (such as the ban on post-graduate students bringing dependents) has created economic risk for many universities, with some facing the threat of insolvency. There is also concern in the UK about a decline in the local 18-year-old population, which may further reduce domestic student enrollment. Meanwhile, inadequate local fees and diminishing government funding per student have deepened this dependence.
Similarly, universities in several other European countries are also facing financial and demographic challenges. Education is free or low-cost for local students in many of these nations, making institutions reliant on government support. Cuts in government funding have encouraged the trend of charging high tuition fees to international students. Moreover, declining birth rates and the shrinking number of young adults (aged 18–24) have pushed universities to look abroad for students.
Due to these uncertainties, British and other foreign universities are now considering establishing campuses in other countries under the Transnational Education (TNE) model to stabilize revenue and maintain their hold on the global education market.
Strong Reasons for Foreign Universities to Expand to India:
- Largest Youth Population: India is home to the world’s largest young population, offering a massive and largely untapped market for higher education. By 2035, India will need approximately 70 million seats.
- High Demand, Low Supply: The demand for quality higher education in India is extremely high, while the availability of good-quality institutions is low, a gap that foreign campuses can help bridge.
- Revenue Stability and Diversification: By opening campuses in India, foreign universities can diversify their revenue streams and avoid volatility caused by changing visa policies abroad.
- Cost-Effective Education: Millions of Indian students travel abroad for studies every year. With campuses opening in India, foreign universities can offer international degrees at 25-50% lower cost compared to studying abroad.
- Supportive Government Policies: Under NEP 2020 and the new UGC regulations (Foreign Universities Campus in India Regulations, 2023), the government has created an enabling environment for top global universities to open campuses in India, granting them significant autonomy to determine curriculum, admission procedures, and fee structures.
Major Benefits for Indian Students:
- Curbing Brain Drain: Students can access world-class education within India, reducing the need to migrate abroad.
- Affordable International Degrees: Indian students can obtain a foreign degree at a fraction of the overseas cost.
- Quality Improvement: Competition with global universities may raise academic standards in Indian institutions.
- Global Education Hub: This step is significant towards making India a Global Education Hub.
Risks and Disadvantages for Indian Students:
Despite the benefits, there are some crucial risks and disadvantages for Indian students that need consideration:
- Exorbitantly High Fee Structure: Even if the cost of studying in India is 25-50% lower than going abroad, the fee structure of these foreign campuses will be several times higher than that of IITs, IIMs, and other central universities of India. This high fee structure will make education a demographic privilege, allowing only the economically affluent class to gain admission, while talented, but underprivileged students, are excluded.
- Potential Dilution of Quality and ‘Name-Only’ Brand: It is difficult to guarantee that all foreign universities coming to India will offer the same teaching quality, top faculty, and cutting-edge research resources as their main campus. There is a possibility that some institutions might operate using only their ‘brand name,’ with inadequate infrastructure or less experienced faculty, leading to a mediocre experience despite high fees.
- Lack of International Exposure: A major benefit of studying abroad is cultural immersion and international networking. Students studying at the Indian campus will not receive the same global cultural immersion and extensive networking opportunities.
- Long-term Negative Impact on Indian Institutions: Due to the extremely high fees of foreign campuses, the most fee-paying and meritorious students from India’s premier private and government institutions might be attracted to these foreign institutions. If a large portion of high-quality students and sufficient fee revenue shifts to foreign campuses, it could cause long-term damage to the financial stability and excellence of the Indian higher education system.
- Parallel, Privilege-Based Education System: The absence of reservation policies and high costs could create a parallel education system, distinct from India’s constitutional goals of social inclusion.
The Reservation Policy Question
A crucial point regarding the fairness of foreign universities’ entry into India is related to the reservation policy.
According to the UGC’s ‘University Grants Commission (Setting up and Operation of Campuses of Foreign Higher Educational Institutions in India) Regulations, 2023,‘ there is no mandatory requirement for foreign universities to reserve seats for affirmative action categories (like in Indian government universities). These Foreign institutions are autonomous in setting their own admission and fee policies.
UGC’s Stance: The UGC Chairman has clarified that, since the Government of India will not fund these institutions, the decision on admission policy (including reservation) will be made solely by the universities themselves, with the UGC having no direct role. The UGC draft regulations do not include any provision for caste-based (SC/ST/OBC) or economic-based (EWS) reservations.
While constitutional reservation is not mandatory, these institutions can offer full or partial merit-based or need-based scholarships and tuition fee waivers to Indian citizens based on their evaluation process.
In summary, legally, these foreign campuses don’t need to implement reservation, which is a subject of debate regarding its fairness, as these institutions could create a parallel higher education system in India that is distinct from the Indian model of social inclusion.
Conclusion
The entry of foreign universities into India is part of a calculated economic and demographic strategy. This move offers an opportunity for revenue diversification for foreign universities struggling with global market instability and funding shortages, while for India, it is a crucial way to meet the demand for quality higher education for its massive youth population.
This step is appropriate and beneficial for curbing “brain drain” and improving the quality of education by offering international degrees within the country. However, the high-fee structure, the risk of quality dilution, and the lack of social inclusion could limit accessibility for many. The non-mandatory nature of reservation in these institutions is a critical aspect that needs continued public debate to ensure that quality international education does not remain merely a privilege.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author solely. TheRise.co.in neither endorses nor is responsible for them. Reproducing this content without permission is prohibited.